America's Party of Georgia
American Thinker By Cindy Simpson and Alan P. Halbert
Two AT writers attended yesterday's hearing in Georgia over [Alleged] President Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot. Cindy Simpson writes:
[Alleged] President Obama has a habit of turning his back and walking away from those with whom he disagrees, as recently discovered
by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer. Professor John Lott, in an interview
with Teri O'Brien
, recalled similar experiences
with Obama while at the University of Chicago.
Ms. O'Brien commented to Professor Lott: "Gods don't debate. They just issue decrees."
And apparently they also tend to place themselves above the law.
On January 26, I was in Atlanta to observe the hearings on the challenges to Obama's eligibility to appear on Georgia's 2012 ballot. In two previous American Thinker blog posts, "The Birthers Went Down to Georgia
" and "Georgia on Obama's Mind
," I described the content and history of the cases.
The courtroom was crowded to maximum capacity; however, the table for the defense was notably vacant. The defendant, Obama himself, was also not in attendance, even though the judge last week refused
to quash the subpoena requesting his presence. Judge Michael Malihi, in his denial, stated:
...Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority...evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary..."
Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski, had warned of his absence in a defiant and last-minute move on the afternoon of January 25, via a letter
he sent to Georgia's Secretary of State Brian Kemp. He requested that Kemp "bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued." Jablonski's letter concluded: "We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26."
A few hours later, the blogosphere lit up with the news that Secretary Kemp had responded
with a letter stating that the hearings would continue on the 26th as scheduled, and concluded with the warning: "...if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH
proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril."
And the hearings did proceed, although approximately 20 minutes late, after Judge Malihi requested a pre-hearing conference with all of the attorneys in his chambers...Read this story at americanthinker.com ...